Using AI to Improve Security and Compliance

Furthermore, calls to address algorithmic discrimination by developing training, providing technical assistance, and enhancing coordination between the Department of Justice and federal civil rights offices. The EO also directs many federal regulators to prepare guidelines or rules or regulations for championing safety and security, data privacy, civil rights, and fairness in the use of AI in their specific sectors – all of which will arguably impact many private businesses developing or using AI technologies in the US. 6clicks empowers government agencies to deliver critical services at scale through integrating people, processes and technology, all while managing malicious threats, complex and evolving regulations, changing markets, and national and global uncertainty. What’s more, our unique and flexible Hub & Spoke architecture provides the perfect integrated and flexible GRC solution for segregating services and departments, ensuring alignment with how you work. “Microsoft has developed a new architecture that enables government agencies to securely access the large language models in the commercial environment from Azure Government allowing those users to maintain the stringent security requirements necessary for government cloud operations,” Chappell added.

In this technology-intensive world, individuals, businesses, and governments use  Artificial Intelligence (AI) to automate their workflows and minimize redundant tasks. According to those from the GAO and the educational institutions that helped to draft the framework, the most responsible uses of AI in government should be centered around four complimentary principles — governance, data, performance and monitoring — all of which are covered in detail within the GAO framework. The US took broad and sweeping action to regulate AI, covering many areas of civil society. AI can be trained to detect intrusion and malware, identify and respond to data breaches, predict user behavior, and stop phishing. Theory of mind is a type of AI that is still very much a theory, though data scientists are actively working toward it. These machines would be able to understand an individual’s motives, reasoning, and needs to respond with personalized results.

Search Lawfare

Projects and startups may find it difficult to navigate the evolving compliance landscape, lacking larger, established companies’ resources. Andrew Ng believes that the right way to regulate is at the application layer, where regulations would be applied based on what AI is used for. For example, AI in biotech would have more stringent requirements than Secure and Compliant AI for Governments AI for copywriters. The criteria for model oversight are based on technical thresholds, specifically 1e26 floating point operations (FLOP), which is roughly 5x the training compute used for GPT-4. To put this in perspective, you’d need nearly 6 billion Excel worksheets, with 17 billion calculations per sheet, to match this level of computing power.

• We’ve been serving clients for more than a century, and we’ve been climbing the ranks of the nation’s largest firms for many years, according to both The Am Law 100 and The National Law Journal.
• In the context of military operations in armed conflict, the United States believes that international humanitarian law (IHL) provides a robust and appropriate framework for the regulation of all weapons, including those using autonomous functions provided by technologies such as AI.
• With Ask Sage, users can access a wide range of data sources in a natural language format, supporting teams in labor-intensive tasks, allowing them to focus on strategic initiatives.

As a result, this application would still be well suited for AI, given a lack of alternatives and low collateral damage from an attack. However, even though AI may still be appropriate in this case, it does not absolve the social network from both preventative and mitigative efforts to counter attacks. For example, the social network may need to determine human involvement in and oversight of the system, such as by executing periodic manual audits of content to identify when its systems have been attacked, and then taking appropriate action such as increased human review of material policed by the compromised system. These suitability tests should be principled and balance potential harms with the need to foster innovation and the development of new technologies. The focus of assessments should include both current and near-future applications of AI. This section sets forth a general AI security compliance program that can be the basis of compliance programs adopted by industry and regulators.

Advancing Federal Government Use of AI

Agencies shall use available policy and technical tools, including privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) where appropriate, to protect privacy and to combat the broader legal and societal risks — including the chilling of First Amendment rights — that result from the improper collection and use of people’s data. (c)  The responsible development and use of AI require a commitment to supporting American workers. As AI creates new jobs and industries, all workers need a seat at the table, including through collective bargaining, to ensure that they benefit from these opportunities. My Administration will seek to adapt job training and education to support a diverse workforce and help provide access to opportunities that AI creates.

The committees shall include the Advanced Aviation Advisory Committee, the Transforming Transportation Advisory Committee, and the Intelligent Transportation Systems Program Advisory Committee. (D)  consider risks identified by the actions undertaken to implement section 4 of this order. (iii)  supplement the report set forth in subsection 7.1(b)(i) of this section as appropriate with recommendations to the President, including with respect to requests for necessary legislation.